Topic 1. Equity Long/Short Strategy
Topic 2. Dedicated Short (Short-Biased) Strategy
Topic 3. Nonhedged Equity Strategy
Topic 4. Global Macro Strategy
Topic 5. Emerging Markets Strategy
Overview: Equity long/short strategies rely heavily on deep fundamental research, evaluating company risks and opportunities across industry conditions, geographic exposure, and macroeconomic trends to identify mispriced securities.
Long and Short Positioning: The strategy involves taking long positions in undervalued stocks and short positions in overvalued ones, allowing managers to capture relative mispricing while reducing overall market exposure.
Alpha Generation Through Selection: Strong security selection is the primary driver of alpha, as managers aim to profit from valuation convergence rather than market movements.
Investment Horizon Planning: Managers define an investment horizon for each position, representing the expected time required for the market price to converge to their valuation estimate.
Event-Driven Opportunities: Funds may exploit corporate events such as mergers or takeovers, building long positions in firms that are likely acquisition targets to benefit from anticipated price revaluation.
Short Position Risk Management: Short positions carry unique risks such as margin calls and short squeezes, so managers carefully monitor holding periods and price movements to limit potential losses.
Diversification and Factor Control: To control risks, managers limit individual short exposures (typically 2–3% of fund capital) and use factor models to neutralize residual exposures beyond market beta.
Financial Components: The performance of this strategy is determined by specific return sources and costs.
Sources of Return:
Alpha Returns: Profits generated from both the long and short positions.
Interest Rebate: Interest earned on the cash proceeds from short sales, net of fees paid to brokers and securities lenders.
Liquidity Buffer Interest: Interest earned on the cash posted at the start of the strategy to cover daily MTM adjustments.
Costs:
Financing and Fees: Charges on margin loans, fees for borrowing shares for short positions, and dividends that must be paid to the lender for borrowed shares.
Transaction Costs: Costs associated with executing trades.
Q1. Which of the following hedge fund strategies is most likely to earn an interest rebate as a source of income?
A. Global macro.
B. Equity long/short.
C. Emerging markets.
D. Nonhedged equity.
Explanation: B is correct.
Equity long/short strategies establish short positions, and the cash proceeds from these short sales can earn an interest rebate. The other strategies do not typically rely on short sale proceeds as a primary income source.
Q2. Which of the following statements best describes the primary risk associated with a dedicated short strategy?
A. Lack of leverage prevents meaningful alpha generation.
B. Short sale proceeds generate insufficient interest rebates to offset costs.
C. Market prices tend to decline over long periods, limiting upside potential.
D. Rising share prices can trigger margin calls and forced covering of positions.
Explanation: D is correct.
Dedicated short strategies face significant risk from rising share prices, which can lead to margin calls, short squeezes, and forced covering.
Topic 1. Fixed-Income Arbitrage
Topic 2. Convertible Arbitrage
Topic 3. Relative Value Arbitrage
Example: Consider two scenarios that both begin with the purchase of a convertible bond. In the first scenario, the investor goes long the convertible bond but does not hedge the position. In the second scenario, the investor again buys the convertible bond but also establishes an arbitrage trade by shorting a specified quantity of the underlying equity. For both examples, assume the following values:
Stock Price: P = $41.54
Convertible Delta:
Conversion Ratio: R = 21.2037 shares
Convertible Price: 101.375% of par = $1,013.75
Compare the outcomes of the unhedged long position in the convertible bond with those of the hedged convertible arbitrage trade. Specifically, calculate the net gain or loss in each scenario when the underlying stock price increases by 5% and decreases by 5%. Based on those results, explain why the hedged strategy alters the payoff profile relative to the unhedged position.
Solution:
Scenario 1: Unhedged Convertible Arbitrage Trade
Scenario 2: Hedged Convertible Arbitrage Trade
Summary: In this hedged scenario, the gain is smaller when the stock price rises, but a drop in the stock price also results in a gain rather than the substantial loss seen in the unhedged case. When the stock declines by 5%, the arbitrage position produces a profit of $1.37, compared with a loss of $19.47 in the unhedged long-only strategy.
Q1. Which of the following characteristics best defines a convertible arbitrage strategy?
A. Buying undervalued sovereign bonds and shorting corporate bonds.
B. Taking offsetting long and short positions across different yield curves.
C. Buying a convertible bond and shorting the underlying stock to hedge equity exposure.
D. Buying stocks with high dividend yields while shorting stocks with relatively low dividend yields.
Explanation: C is correct.
Convertible arbitrage involves purchasing a convertible bond and shorting the issuer’s stock to hedge equity sensitivity while profiting from income and volatility.
Q2. A pairs trading strategy is best classified as which type of arbitrage?
A. Merger arbitrage.
B. Convertible arbitrage.
C. Fixed-income arbitrage.
D. Relative value arbitrage.
Explanation: D is correct.
Pairs trading is a relative value arbitrage strategy that exploits temporary price divergences between two historically correlated securities.
Topic 1. Event-Driven Strategies
Topic 2. Activist Strategy
Topic 3. Merger Arbitrage
Topic 4. Distressed Securities Strategy
Overview: Event-driven strategies are designed to capitalize on pricing discrepancies and market inefficiencies created by specific corporate events.
Sources: Event-driven investment opportunities can arise from the following categories.
1. Strategic Opportunities (Hard Catalysts)
These involve major shifts in a company's structure or ownership.
Risk Arbitrage: Profiting from the price gap during mergers and acquisitions.
Takeover Targets: Identifying and taking positions in firms likely to be acquired.
Spin-offs: Investing in the separation of a division or business unit into an independent company.
Stub Trades: Isolating the discount between a holding company’s share price and the actual value of its underlying assets.
Strategic Alternatives: Evaluating a firm’s stated options (like a sale or restructuring) and positioning accordingly.
Activist Campaigns: Positioning around proxy contests or shareholder-led pressure for change.
Overview: Event-driven strategies are designed to capitalize on pricing discrepancies and market inefficiencies created by specific corporate events.
Sources: Event-driven investment opportunities can arise from the following categories.
Strategic (Hard Catalysts) Opportunities
Financial Opportunities
Operational Opportunities
Legal and Regulatory Opportunities
Technical Opportunities
Strategic Opportunities:
Risk arbitrage
Evaluating a firm’s strategic alternatives and taking a position
Potential spin-offs of divisions or business units
Taking positions in likely takeover targets
Proxy contests or activist shareholder campaigns
Stub trades, which isolate and profit from the discount between a holding company’s share
price and the value of its underlying assets
Financial Opportunities:
Anticipating price movements based on credit re-ratings or liquidity events
Changes in accounting methods
Financial recapitalizations
Primary offerings of debt or equity
Bankruptcy reorganizations
Operational Opportunities:
Synergies from mergers
Corporate turnaround or restructuring opportunities
Senior management changes
Legal/Regulatory Opportunities:
Taking positions based on litigation outcomes
Taking positions based on regulatory changes
Taking positions based on anticipated legislation
Broken risk arbitrage situations
Secondary offerings of equity or equity-linked notes
Hedge Fund Advantage in Merger Arbitrage: Hedge funds participate more actively because they possess specialized expertise in legal, regulatory, and antitrust analysis to assess deal completion probabilities, and they can enhance returns using hedging strategies such as short positions.
Example: Global Semiconductors makes a tender offer to the shareholders of Local Semiconductors at $12 per share. Before the acquisition announcement, Local’s stock was trading at $9 per share, and it immediately rose to $10.50 after the offer. The deal is expected to close in six months, with an estimated 90% probability of completion. Calculate the expected annualized return from entering a merger arbitrage position in Local.
Solution: C = 0.90; G = $12 – $10.50 = $1.50; L = $10.50 – $9 = $1.50; P = $10.50; Y = 6 / 12 = 0.50
Q1. Novelty Healthcare has received a tender offer from a larger competitor. The offer terms specify a price of $30 per share. Before the announcement, Novelty’s stock traded at $25, and it rose to $29 after the offer was made public. Analysts at Primus Fund estimate that the deal has a 75% probability of closing and expect completion within three months. What is the annualized expected return from a merger arbitrage position in Novelty’s stock?
A. −3.45%.
B. −3.33%.
C. 0.25%.
D. 11.25%.
Explanation: A is correct.
Challenges, Risks and Key Considerations:
Example: Naples Ocean Views (NOV), a real estate holding company, may be forced to file for bankruptcy. The firm has $1 billion of 5% debt maturing in 10 years, which is currently trading at a steep discount of $30 per $100 of face value. Bankruptcy is expected within two years. NOV’s stock is trading at $3 per share. In the event of liquidation, the bonds are estimated to be worth $35 per $100 of face value. Assume an investor follows the distressed strategy of buying one NOV bond with $1,000 face value at $300 and shorting 100 shares of NOV stock at $3. If the firm is liquidated in two years, calculate the gains on the bond position and the equity short position.
Solution: Gain on bond position: Receive coupon payments of 5% on $1,000 for two years ($50 per year, total $100), plus $350 in liquidation value, for total inflows of $450. Net gain on the bond = $450 – $300 = $150.
Gain on equity short position: Short sale proceeds are $300, and the stock becomes worthless, so the investor does not need to buy back the shares. Net gain on the equity short = $300.
Total gain = $150 + $300 = $450
Q2. Which of the following scenarios best reflects the core risk faced by investors in distressed securities?
A. A restructuring process takes longer than expected.
B. Senior secured creditors receive the lowest recoveries.
C. Bankruptcy guarantees predictable outcomes for all creditors.
D. High trading volume in distressed debt limits position building.
Explanation: A is correct.
Distressed investing carries significant timing risk, because prolonged restructuring or bankruptcy proceedings can erode expected returns.